Welcome to Liberty Share. On this site we will post comments on all subjects related to Freedom and Liberty


Hiatis: I have been on a bit of a Hiatis over past few weeks, now I am ready to return with a new vigor. The liberty share blog will be updated at least daily. My goal is to keep news articles relavint and up to date. If you have any suggestion or feed back do not hesitate to join in.


Filed under: Uncategorized

10 Facts That Prove The Bin Laden Fable Is a Contrived Hoax

Reposting of an article written by: Paul Joseph Watson

May 9, 2011
Merely a week after President Obama announced the death of Osama Bn Laden, there is literally a deluge of evidence that clearly indicates the wole episode has been manufactured for political gain and to return Americans to a state of post-9/11 intellectual castration so that they can be easily
manipulated in the run up to the 2012 election. Here are ten facts that prove the Bin Laden fable is a contrived hoax….

1) Before last Sunday’s raid, everyintelligence analyst, geopolitical commentator or head of state worth theirsalt was on record as stating that Osama Bin Laden was already dead, and that he probably died many years ago, from veteran CIA officer Robert Baer, to former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, to former FBI head of counterterrorism Dale Watson. In addition, back in 2002 AlexJones was told directly by two separate high level sources that Bin Laden was already dead and that his death would be announced at the most politically opportune moment. Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under five different Presidents, serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under the Nixon, Ford and Carter, toldthe Alex Jones Show last week that Bin Laden died of marfan syndrome shortly after he was visited by CIAphysicians at the American Hospital in Dubai in July 2001.

2) The official narrative of how the raid unfolded completelycollapsed within days of its announcement. First there had been a 40 minute shootout, then there was no shootout and just one man was armed, first Bin Laden was armed then he was not, first Bin Laden used his wife as a human shield and then he did not. First the compound was described as a “$1 million dollar mansion” then it turned out to be a rubbish-strewn dilapidated compound that was worth less than a quarter of that. Almost every single aspect of the official narrative has changed since Obama first described the raid last Sunday as the White House struggles to keep its story straight.

3) The alleged body of Bin Laden was hastily dumped in the sea to prevent any proper procedure of identification. The White House claimed this was in accordance with normal Islamic burial rituals, however numerous Muslim scholars all over the globe disputed this claim, pointing out that Muslims can only be buried at sea if they die at sea. While the White House claimed that Bin Laden’s death on May 1st was proven by DNA and facial recognition evidence, such proof was never released for public scrutiny and the Obama administration refused to release photos of Bin Laden’s dead body, suggesting a cover-up.

4) Despite the fact that the White House released “situation room” photos which purported to show Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and the
rest of Obama’s security staff watching the raid which killed Bin Laden live, it was later admitted by CIA director Leon Panetta that Obama could not have seen the raid because the live feed was cut off before the Navy SEALS entered the compound. The photos were described by many as having “historical
significance,” forming a “captivating” record of Obama’s greatest success and being the “defining moment” of his Presidency. One image showed Hillary Clinton with her hand over her mouth as if witnessing an anxious or crucial moment in the raid. Media reports at the time claimed that the photos represented the moment when “The leader of the free world saw the terror chief shot in the left eye.” However, the photos were staged as a PR stunt for public consumption, nobody in the photos ever saw Bin Laden killed live, nor did they see the Navy SEALS even enter the compound.

5) As even mainstream journalists began to cast suspicion on the official narrative behind the raid, the media reported that Al-Qaeda itself had confirmed every detail of Obama’s address the the nation. However, the conduit for such a claim was in fact an organization called SITE, which is a notorious
Pentagon propaganda front run by the daughter of an Israeli spy that has been caught on numerous occasions releasing fake cartoonish “Al-Qaeda” videos
at the most politically expedient times for both the Bush and Obama administrations. The SITE organization is nothing more than a contractor for the U.S. government, receiving some $500,000 a year annually from Uncle Sam, and yet the corporate media instantly swallowed and regurgitated the claim that
“Al-Qaeda” had confirmed the official story after SITE directed them to an anonymous posting on an Islamic website.

6) Almost every single neighbor that lived near the alleged Bin Laden compound in Abbottabad that was interviewed by news reporters said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there. Since the town is a staging ground for the Pakistani military, which has a training facility situated virtually a stone’s throw away from the alleged Bin Laden compound, residents were required to show ID when they moved into the area. Pakistani troops and anti-terror police in the town refused to confirm that Bin Laden had lived in the house. Barack Obama himself admitted to 60 Minutes that the White House was only 55/45 sure that Osama lived there before the raid and this uncertainty prompted concerns that the US Navy SEALS sent in could have targeted a “prince from Dubai” or some other individual that was not Bin Laden.

7) The videos released by the White House this past weekend which purport to show Osama Bin Laden making Al-Qaeda tapes in October-November 2010
are almost identical to footage first released by Pentagon front group SITE nearly four years ago. Remember, a May 2010 Washington Post story reported how the CIA had admitted to making fake Bin Laden videos. Despite the White House’s insistence that the footage of Bin Laden is recent, he looks younger and healthier than tapes released almost a decade ago, having apparently dyed his beard black. A separate video that purports to show Bin Laden in his compound flicking through satellite TV channels depicts a much older looking man with a gray beard. Analysts have pointed out that the man has different shaped ears to real Osama pictures from back in 2001. A doctor has also pointed out the fact that the man in the tapes released Saturday has no problem moving his left arm, whereas video from 2001 clearly illustrates how Bin Laden was unable to move his left upper extremity because of a permanent injury probably related to damage to the peripheral nerves. Why the cameraman would film the back of Bin Laden’s head as he watches television is also dubious. Residents in the town of Abbottabad claim the man in the “television” video is not Osama, with one individual claiming that the man labeled by the White House as being Bin Laden is actually his neighbor, a man named Akhbar Han.

8: Despite the fact that numerous neo-cons came out on the days after the alleged raid to erroneously assert that torturing terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay led to the discovery of Bin Laden, Osama himself, the supposed world’s most wanted terrorist and a treasure trove of terror information, despite the fact that he was unarmed, was not taken in for questioning, he was instantly shot in the head according to the official narrative.

9) The US government has been caught on several occasions within the past decade staging military operations for the purposes of generating contrived, pro-war sentiment amongst the American public. Both the “rescue” of Jessica Lynch and the death of Pat Tillman were complete fables, scripted and staged at complete odds with the truth and unleashed on Americans as part of a psychological warfare offensive to elicit support for the war on terror, almost identical to what we’re seeing now with the Bin Laden sideshow. Given the fact that the US government has been caught red-handed scripting tales of pure fiction in order to justify the war on terror, notably in the cases of Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman, why on earth should we believe them now?

10) Despite the fact that Obama announced last Sunday on live television that the world was now “safer” because Bin Laden was dead, his administration, with the aid of the fearmongering mass media, instantly seized upon the situation to terrify Americans into being afraid of imminent “reprisal” terror attacks inside the United States, later claiming that Bin Laden had formulated an “aspirational rather than operational” plan to derail US trains that travel over 500mph, although no trains in the US can actually travel at such speeds. This led “terror experts” to salivate over how TSA agents were now needed in shopping malls to stick their hands down Americans’ pants, while New York Senator Chuckie Schumer called for the no fly list to be expanded to trains and subways. Obama hurried to ground zero for a photo op as he desperately tried to use the Bin Laden hoax to whip up phony patriotism as a means of boosting his flagging poll numbers. Others, like Democrat Bill Richardson, exploited the situation to try and push through policies that had no connection to Bin Laden or terrorism at all, like cap and trade. The haste with which the whole Bin Laden fable was exploited for political points scoring and as a psychological ploy to return Americans to a post-9/11 state of intellectual castration was painfully transparent, clearly suggesting that the entire farce was planned well in advance to achieve precisely those goals in the run up to 2012.

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones

Filed under: Uncategorized

Meeting – 5/10/2011

Everyone we are having a meeting on 10 May 2011 at the Shooting Range in Oroville, CA starting at 1500 hours. We are planning to do some target practice, clay pigeon shoot, cover current events and BBQ. Come and enjoy. RSVP by 9 May 2011. Hope to see you there.

Filed under: Events

Osama’s Nine Deaths

Over the last 10 years Osama Bin Ladan has reportedly died or otherwise been eliminated by some accounts as many as nine different times. It was widely known that Osama has a number fairly significant medical problems including but not limited to Renal Failure. Renal failure in of itself is not a death sentence but requires a great deal of continual medical treatment that would be difficult at best to maintain while on the “run” from the authorities.

Osama’s capture, death and subsequent burial at sea is dubious at best and has the symptoms of being an out in out fake. There are so many inconsistencies with this story it is difficult to know where to start.

Osama was found near in a well populated area surrounded by Pakistani military bases frequently visited by US military intelligence after a raid conducted by SEAL team 6. SEAL team 6 according to account eliminated all living occupants of this building including Osama. This in of itself seems more that unusual at best. In my experience elite units such as SEAL team 6 would have known the value of a target such as Osama bin Ladan and the likelihood that they would have accident eliminated him at the time of the raid is minimal at best. The SEAL team members in cases of high value targets would have gone out of their way to ensure this type of individual would have been extracted in the best possible condition for further intelligence gathering.

Next highly suspicious action is the burial at sea within 24 hours of the raid. Over the last 20 years any highly sought target captured or eliminated has been placed on pubic display. Case in point Saddam Husain was found by a group of soldiers hiding in a “hole” during a combat operation and they made the logical decision to bring Saddam Husain back without injury. It seems that skilled soldiers such as SEALs would have made such a choice given their situation during the raid on Sunday night.

The US government is obviously hiding something given all of the inconsistencies. It is my opinion that Osama Bin Ladan was likely deceased a long time and for political reasons he is now officially being declared dead. Some likely reasons that the present administration would use this type of tactic to change the news cycle are as follows: 1. President Obama’s recent release of a dubious proof of birth. 2. Dollar devaluation. 3. Dollar decoupling from the global currency. 4. President Obama’s popularity drop over the last few months. any of the above are likely candidates for creating a new diversion.

It is truly unfortunate that our government has become so prone to deception that it makes it difficult to believe anything despite the then candidate Obama’s promise to make his administration the most transparent in history. It is obvious that the now President Obama has a different view of governmental transparency.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Cell Phone Tracking

Over the last few weeks the mainstream press has started looking into the cell phone tracking functionality of iPhones and Google phones. The fact is the mainstream news is getting to this rather late in the process. Individual broadcasters like Alex Jones and Michael Savage has mentioned this during there radio talk shows. Telecommunication producers do not just issue iPhone and Google phones with this capability all smart / cell phone since 2001 have had this functionality built in. Furthermore; the phone allow governmental agencies to activate the phones remotely and listen in during conversations.

In 1994 the then president Bill Clinton signed into law the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act and the Stored Communications Act combined allow law enforcement to “tap” into any electronic devices with only a “high probable cause” need. These Act’s strip the right to privacy away from the individual by stating that all data stored on the internet is considered public property and therefore should not be allow the same protection as private property. This is a total violation of the 4th amendment.

The purposeful destruction of our civil liberties must be fought at every level. These laws though on the surface may seem benign to some and helpful to others do nothing more than make everyone less free. It is time to demand congress repeal such a oppressive law. In my opinion regardless of the situation no governmental or private agency should have the authority to track any activities of any individual by any means without the individuals expressed written authority or a warrant.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Fukushima Aftermath

On 11 March 2011 the Fukushima nuclear reactors 1 through 6 were damaged beyond repair by a combination 9.1 earthquake and a subsequent tsunami. Over the first few days following the cataclysmic earthquake and tsunami the Japanese Government and Tokyo Power denied the reactors were seriously damaged let alone close to meltdown. Unfortunately the US Government did little or nothing to prepare the American citizens about potential fallout effects from the leaking reactors other than to downplay the seriousness of the situation. As the days have turned into weeks a local tragedy into a global calamity that is now greater in severity than the Chernobyl meltdown.

Through a timeline of links a clearer picture of the totality severity of the situation can be visualized. During recent storms in California the radioactive iodine as found to be 181 times normal level at UC Berkley. Even after these levels were discovered and reported by UC Berkley neither the Federal or State govenments made any effort to inform the citizens about any potental risk. The EPA is planning to go as far as to raise the safe limits of radioactive exposure.

Filed under: Uncategorized

More Than 25000 Documents Released By Federal Reserve

On 31 March 2011 The Federal Reserve was forced by the US Supreme Court more than 25,000 documents to Bloomberg magazine about loans given during the height of
the financial crisis. After only a few days review of the documents researchers have uncovered the Fed has handed out Billions of dollars to foreign companies
and central banks. This practice strikes at the heart of the American tax payer. The US tax payer has now been subjugated by our treasury through the selling of bonds to back the loans given to foreign organizations.

On 4 April 2011 Congressman Paul has announced his Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology will hold hearings on
the more than 25,000 documents released last week by the Federal Reserve. The dates on the proposed hearing  on these documents have yet to be posted.

On 31 March 2011 Congressman Ron Paul from Bloomberg:

Congressman Ron Paul from Fox Business:

“I am, even with all my cynicism, still shocked at the amount this is and of course shocked, but not completely surprised, [that] much [of] this money went to help foreign banks,” said Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), chairman of the House Financial Services subcommittee on domestic monetary policy, in an interview with FOX Business on Friday. “I don’t have [any] plan [for] legislation…It will take awhile to dissect that out, to find out exactly who benefitted and why.”…

The following statements are quotes from Thomas Jefferson regarding Central Banks and indebtedness:

The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution.
I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their
currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property
until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered.
If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, and give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for
their debts and daily expenses; And the sixteen being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they do now, on oatmeal and potatoes, have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanages to account; But be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains around the necks of our fellow sufferers; And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second, that second for a third, and so on ’til the bulk of society is reduced to mere
automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering…and the forehorse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression.

The Federal Reserve Act is completed 21 December 2012. It is time to end the contract and have the US Congress manage our monetary affairs as directed by US Constitution rather than an organization that is not required to report to the American people.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Obama Libyan “Kinetic Confrontation”

On 28 March 2011 President Obama addressed the nation about the Libyan “Kinetic Confrontation” code word for war.  President Obama did little or nothing to justify his actions during his speech yesterday for unilaterally waging Kinetic Confrontations or War against Libya during this speech. (President Obama a one time Constitutional Lawyer no doubt is fully aware that such actions are wholly unconstitutional.) Instead Obama turned to the typical rhetoric stating that it was imperative the USA act before properly reviewing the seriousness of the grievances Libya poses to the US in congress. 

Because of the brazen unconstitutional act of unilaterally declaring a Kinetic Confrontation or war on Libya Ron Paul (R-TX) and Representative Dennis J. Kucinich (D – OH) have publicly called for President Obamas impeachment. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich point to Article 1 section 8 of the US constitution the US congress is the only governmental body with the authority to declare war or “Kinetic Confrontations”. If President Obama as the constitutional lawyer believed that it was in the USA best interest to wage war against the Libyans he was should have compiled the proper list of issues and transgressions against the Libyan government and presented such list to the floor of the house so a debate of the people by the people could have been conducted.

Instead President Obama had decided to without support the US Congress and initiate immediate intervention citing a catastrophe of epic proportions was likely to ensue and the Libyan people would be raped and killed by Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi supporters. As commander and chief the president has the authority to manage a war once the war has been authorized by congress not to pre-emptively strike whenever the United Nations or he/she feels suited.

As with the call to war a call to presidential impeachment should not be taken lightly. In the cases of brazen acts of unconstitutional activities it becomes the congresses duty to take action and protect the people from unlawful activates of the executive branch.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Vice Presidnet Joe Biden, President has no autority to wage war without congress

On Hardball with Chris
4 December 2007, Joe Biden emphatically asserts he would seek an impeachment of then President George Bush if he preemptively engaged Iran
without congressional support. Since then Vice President Biden has either changed his mind about the meaning of authorization of war or has been shown to
be a pure political elitist. It is my opinion both are true. President Obama has once again impulsively directed the United States into a confrontation, unilaterally,
without congressional authorization, albeit with UN resolution. The current spin from the globalist elite referring to this war as humanitarian relief or
kinetic confrontation cannot be seen any other way that pure political rhetoric directed at the sleeping masses for pacification and legitimization.

Thomas Woods a senior fellow and member of the Mises institute eloquently explains the phonycase for presidential war powers.  As Woods explains in this video, regardless of reason the President has no authorityto engage in any acts of aggression without congressional approval.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Ron Paul: Obama and One World Government

  The following is an excerpt of an article written by:

Steve Watson
March 22, 2011

 Congressman Ron Paul made a sweep of television appearances yesterday to voice his strong opposition to the attack on Libya, and making it clear that the president is subverting US national sovereignty by bypassing Congress to engage in illegal acts of aggression.

Appearing on Freedom Watch with Judge Andrew Napolitano, the Congressman pulled no punches when explaining why he believes Obama went to the UN for authority to drop bombs on Libya, rather than congress.

“I think he philosophically believes in one world government,” Paul stated.

“He wants to keep nudging us in that direction. I don’t believe he has a conviction that national sovereignty has any value. So therefore if they can diminish the Congress.” he continued.

“If he diminishes the Congress and he can get his authority from the United Nations then this enhances what he believes in. But he is not alone, the leadership in both parties has been nudging in that direction for a long time.” the Congressman added.

“To think of all the effort that the founders went to make the Congress the most important body, that they are now the most willing to give up their prerogatives and give it to the executive branch and the judicial branch, and onward and onward. Our leaderships in the House as long as I’ve been there have always deferred to the executive branch.” he said.

Paul once again urged the American people to recognize the military incursion into Libya as a war of opportunity.

“It is unnecessary, it is wrong, it has nothing to do with national security, it has nothing to do with the defense of this country.” he said.

“I think there is more to do with it than just that. That may be their cover. It may be that oil is an important issue here. We didn’t go to Rwanda for humanitarian reasons, so I’m not to sure that oil might not be the real clincher here.”

Ron Paul on Freedom Watch: Obama Believes In One World Government, Not National Sovereignty

Filed under: Uncategorized